Last week, the Roundnose Grenadier visited the United Nations, where delegates met for the Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea (ICP). Roundnose had a little trouble getting in the UN, but luckily he made some friends outside who could help guide him.
The Deep Sea Conservation Coalition (DSCC) is an alliance of over 70 international organizations working to promote the conservation of deep sea biodiversity. More information can be found on our website.
Tuesday, 28 June 2011
Monday, 27 June 2011
The Dangers of Deep Sea Bottom Trawling
Deep-sea bottom trawling is one of the main reasons the coalition came together. It is the most common type of deep sea fishing - an estimated 80% of the high seas deep-sea catch is taken through bottom trawling.
And deep-sea bottom trawling is very bad for the marine environment. It’s so destructive that over 1,000 scientists from around the world signed a petition to ban it back in 2004.
Why is deep-sea bottom trawling so destructive? Two reasons.
First, you have the gear. Huge nets with weighted rollers and heavy doors are dragged across the sea floor. This method grinds away the bottom habitat and indiscriminately catches whatever falls in or leaves it crushed in its wake. To draw a better picture, one company markets what it calls 'Canyonbusters' - trawl doors that weigh up to five tons each!
Second, deep-sea life is tremendously fragile. Because of the extreme conditions, ecosystem productivity is very low. This means that a deep-sea ecosystem will take decades to centuries to recover even from a single trawl sweep.
Here’s the deep sea before and after the pass of a bottom trawl net:
|
|
Want to know more? Here’s a great video put together by Greenpeace, one of our coalition members.
Source:
Matthew Gianni (2004). High Seas Bottom Trawl Fisheries and their Impacts on the Biodiversity of Vulnerable Deep-Sea Ecosystems: Options for International Action. Executive Summary. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available here.
(Images: Deep-sea coral reefs off Florida's Atlantic coast, before and after trawling, Credit: Deep Sea Conservation Coalition.)
(Images: Deep-sea coral reefs off Florida's Atlantic coast, before and after trawling, Credit: Deep Sea Conservation Coalition.)
Wednesday, 22 June 2011
Not All High Seas MPAs Are Created Equal
A major goal of the marine conservation community is to see that more marine protected areas (MPAs) are established because they have been found to be highly effective to protect ocean ecosystems. The international community has even gone so far as to include a goal under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) to establish MPAs in 10% of the world’s marine areas by 2020.
That’s a huge amount of ocean to be protected – 36 million square kilometers. Unfortunately, the world is not on-track to meet the 2020 goal. Only 1.31% of the world ocean is covered by MPAs and few are on the high seas because of the legal complexities.
Now we are learning that some high seas MPAs are not very effective. According to Jeff Ardron, Director of the High Seas Program at the Marine Conservation Institute (MCI) some MPAs have been developed according to science, but other MPAs have been created less systematically—sometimes with the intention of not protecting the most vulnerable areas! Jeff and his colleagues at MCI are presently studying these inconsistencies in high seas MPAs around the world.
Watch the video below for Jeff’s take on the problem:
Tuesday, 21 June 2011
This Week: The United Nations ICP Meeting
![]() |
| According to a 2008 analysis published in Science, over 40% of the world's oceans are heavily affected by human activities and few if any areas remain untouched. |
The DSCC is back at the United Nations headquarters to advocate for much needed deep-sea conservation measures. This week marks the 12th meeting of the ‘United Nations Open-ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea’. In UN-speak, the annual meeting referred to as ‘UNICPOLOS’ or ‘ICP’.
So why is ICP important? Well, it’s the principle annual meeting where the UN General Assembly a) reviews developments in ocean affairs, and b) identifies areas where international coordination and cooperation could be improved. An important element of this meeting is the Report of the Secretary-General that is presented and considered by the General Assembly. (The report is good reading for anyone interested in the latest updates on international marine policy.)
ICP takes on a particular theme each year, and this year that theme is the June 2012 UN Conference on Sustainable Development (or Rio+20), possibly the most influential global environment conference this decade. The Rio+20 meeting has the potential to bring all 192 member states of the UN together to take decisions how we can sustain the well-being of our planet and ourselves. The original Rio Earth Summit (or UN Conference on Environment and Development) resulted in (among other things): the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and the Framework Convention on Climate Change.
The challenge, however, is that the focus of Rio+20 has not yet been decided. As BBC correspondent Richard Black writes, it is a ‘big summit’ in search of a ‘big idea’. The DSCC and the rest of the ocean community believe that big idea should be the oceans.
According to the preliminary findings of a major new report, the global ocean is "at high risk of entering a phase of extinction of marine species unprecedented in human history" as a result of overfishing, pollution, and climate change. International waters – which cover 45% of the planet – are essentially open for managed exploitation. The main exception is international fisheries. They are partially managed in some areas of the world, but overall evaluations show them to be failing in their conservation mandates.
The DSCC believes that the time has come for the world to tackle the serious and long-running threats to the marine environment. This week we will be looking to the ICP to ensure that the oceans are a high priority at next year’s summit. We will also continue to push our UN goals specific to deep-sea conservation this year.
(Image: A Global Map of Human Impacts to Marine Ecosystems, Credit: National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis.)
Friday, 10 June 2011
The Fish Can Dance!
While on his way to the United Nations, our Roundnose Grenadier stopped in at a 'splash' mob held in honor of World Oceans Day at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History in Washington, DC. Roundnose was happy to see his deep-sea friend, Orange Roughy there. Roughy is tired of the deep sea bottom trawlers messing up her home too so she agreed to help Roundnose do what they can to put a stop to them!
Who knew Roundnose and Roughy could boogie down with the best of them?! Look out Dancing with the Stars, here come your next champions!
Who knew Roundnose and Roughy could boogie down with the best of them?! Look out Dancing with the Stars, here come your next champions!
Thursday, 9 June 2011
Interview with an Expert: Susanna Fuller on the Implementation of the UN Resolutions
The main challenge to deep-sea conservation on the high seas is the fact that a handful of deep-sea fishing countries is not following the rules. Recently, this fact was further explored by the DSCC in the preliminary findings from its third comprehensive review of the implementation of UN General Assembly resolutions calling for protection of the deep sea. (The full report is forthcoming.)
Recently, the DSCC was able to discuss this problem with Susanna Fuller, the Marine Conservation Coordinator at the Ecology Action Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Among the topics discussed are:
- Partial implementation of UN resolutions by the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) [0:31]
- The behavior of countries' fleets on the high seas and, in particular, their inconsistency in implementing their obligations across different ocean regions [2:52]
- Preparing for the UN's review of the implementation of its resolutions in September this year [4:11]
Wednesday, 8 June 2011
Deep-Sea Fishing Countries Fail to Implement United Nations Agreements
![]() |
| The DSCC presented its preliminary findings at a side event during the UN's BBNJ working group meeting on June 2, 2011. |
Last week at the BBNJ meeting the DSCC reported the preliminary findings from its third comprehensive review of the implementation of UN General Assembly resolutions calling for protection of the deep sea.
The results? Failure to implement the resolutions is leaving the majority of deep-sea biodiversity on the high seas threatened by destructive fishing. (You may recall that we've discussed the relevant UN resolutions here.)
The main findings from this report are:
- Most deep-sea fisheries have been heavily depleted.
- Nearly all regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs) and States have fallen so far short of the requirements as to warrant immediate closure of their deep-sea fisheries on the high seas (the only exception is in the Antarctic or CCAMLR region).
- Many vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) remain open with few or no constraints.
- There has been a general reluctance to close areas where most bottom fishing currently takes place, or has taken place in recent years.
- Flag states are selectively implementing the resolutions, obeying them in some ocean regions and ignoring them elsewhere.
- Failure to effectively implement the resolutions risks undermining the authority and efficacy of the UN General Assembly.
- Other nations must declare that any fish caught in contravention of the resolutions should be considered illegal, unregulated and unreported (IUU).
The full report will be released in June.
*Note: 'BBNJ’ is UN-speak for the ‘The Ad Hoc open-ended informal working group to study issues relating to the conservation and sustainable use of marine Biodiversity Beyond areas of National Jurisdiction’
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



